Beware AI euphoria - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Beware AI euphoria

Like all great bubble stories, the latest tech narrative conveys a sense of inevitability
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":7.37,"text":"Another week, another record high in US equity markets. "},{"start":11.149000000000001,"text":"Last week’s jump was triggered by the Federal Reserve’s signal that investors can look forward to more interest rate cuts this year. "},{"start":17.317,"text":"But deeper market bullishness is built on two things: the cash reserves of the tech giants that now dominate the markets, and belief in their ability to monetise artificial intelligence. "}],[{"start":27.82,"text":"AI will “change the world”, we are told. "},{"start":30.749,"text":"It will radically increase productivity (albeit by disrupting millions of jobs). "},{"start":35.379,"text":"It will create a huge new wealth pie for the world to share. "},{"start":38.609,"text":"And, according to a breathless ARK Invest report that last week predicted a $40tn boost to global gross domestic product from AI by 2030, it will “transform every sector, impact every business, and catalyze every innovation platform”. "}],[{"start":53.46,"text":"It’s the euphoria and sense of inevitability in this straightforward narrative that makes me nervous. "},{"start":58.602000000000004,"text":"Even if you believe AI will be today’s equivalent of electricity or the internet, we are at the very early stages of a highly complex multi-decade transformation that is by no means a done deal. "},{"start":68.194,"text":"Yet valuations are pricing in the entire sea change, and then some. "},{"start":72.162,"text":"A February report by Currency Research Associates pointed out that it would take 4,500 years for Nvidia’s future dividends to equal its current price. "},{"start":80.767,"text":"Talk about a long tail. "}],[{"start":83.35,"text":"While Nvidia isn’t Pets.com — it has tangible revenues from selling real things — the overall AI narrative depends on many uncertain assumptions. "},{"start":91.892,"text":"For example, AI requires huge amounts of water and energy. "},{"start":95.759,"text":"There’s a push in both the US and EU to get companies to disclose their usage. "},{"start":100.064,"text":"Whether via carbon pricing, or a tax on resource usage, it’s quite likely that those input costs will rise significantly in the future. "}],[{"start":107.99,"text":"Likewise, AI developers don’t now have to own the copyright to content on which the models are trained. "},{"start":113.81899999999999,"text":"They don’t have to make profits on AI itself, of course; the assumption of future gains is enough to fuel the froth. "},{"start":119.97399999999999,"text":"Relentless techno-optimism and the illusion of inevitability is how Silicon Valley creates paper wealth. "},{"start":125.454,"text":"But remember, many of the proponents of “AI everywhere” were touting web3, crypto, the metaverse and the benefits of the gig economy not so long ago. "}],[{"start":134.42,"text":"One big difference, of course, is that AI has been validated by huge, cash-rich, market-leading companies such as Microsoft, Google and Amazon. "},{"start":143.712,"text":"But even within those companies developers have their doubts. "},{"start":146.767,"text":"One senior staffer at a leading AI company recently admitted to me, when pushed, that the profit assumptions around the technology were based “more on speculation than substance”, and that it has major kinks still to be worked out. "}],[{"start":158.88,"text":"Anyone who’s experimented with large language models can vouch for this. "},{"start":162.909,"text":"I wouldn’t rely on a chatbot when doing research for my own work because I don’t want to worry about the accuracy of the data I’m being fed. "},{"start":169.552,"text":"I also don’t want to give up my ability to curate my own informational inputs. "},{"start":173.494,"text":"I’d much rather do a Google search and see sources and citations laid out. "}],[{"start":178.47,"text":"I’m admittedly operating at the high end of the white-collar job spectrum. "},{"start":182.537,"text":"But even for more rote middle-market tasks, there are lots of questions about how to integrate AI into workflows, and whether it will really be more productive than the humans it may replace. "},{"start":191.59199999999998,"text":"And the humans are beginning to revolt. "},{"start":193.672,"text":"The Hollywood writers’ strikes were at their core about control of AI, and unions are taking on the issue of technology regulation more broadly. "}],[{"start":201.85,"text":"Meanwhile, the copyright backlash against AI is gaining steam. "},{"start":206.179,"text":"Last week, French regulators fined Google €250mn for failing to notify news publishers that it was using their articles to train its AI algorithms, and for not licensing fair deals. "},{"start":216.934,"text":"This follows similar suits against OpenAI and Microsoft brought by the New York Times. "},{"start":221.739,"text":"As AI works its way into proprietary corporate data sets, opportunities for litigation over copyright will increase, and possibly even dovetail with worker complaints over corporate surveillance. "}],[{"start":232.82,"text":"Then there’s the monopoly problem. "},{"start":234.974,"text":"As Meredith Whittaker, president of the Signal Foundation and the co-founder of the AI Now Institute, wrote in 2021, modern AI advances are “primarily the product of significantly concentrated data and compute resources that reside in the hands of a few large tech corporations”. "},{"start":249.917,"text":"Our increasing reliance on such AI, Whittaker added, “cedes inordinate power over our lives and institutions to a handful of tech firms”. "}],[{"start":258.44,"text":"The so-called Magnificent Seven companies have driven AI enthusiasm and stock market gains over the past year. "},{"start":264.644,"text":"They have pushed the concentration of the S&P 500 to a historic extreme. "},{"start":268.987,"text":"But as a recent Morgan Stanley Wealth Management report notes, “index concentration has historically proved self-correcting, with some combination of regulatory, market and competitive forces, along with business cycle dynamics, undermining static leadership”. "},{"start":282.792,"text":"The report says “analysis suggests that equity returns have typically struggled following peaks in concentration”. "}],[{"start":289.43,"text":"That combination of correcting factors might include the growing number of Big Tech antitrust cases and the possibility that carbon pricing and copyright fines will challenge the “free” inputs necessary to make a profit. "}],[{"start":300.86,"text":"Whether you see AI as the next tulip bubble or the next combustion engine, it’s worth questioning how the market is pricing this story. "}],[{"start":307.45,"text":""}]],"url":"https://creatives.ftacademy.cn/album/147778-1711598105.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

再次陷入危机的大众汽车能走上改革之路吗?

欧洲最大的汽车制造商正与工人和政界人士交战,试图渡过痛苦的电动汽车转型期。

哈里斯的另一个大选对手:通货膨胀

美国选民对高昂生活成本的不满可能决定下周谁将赢得白宫。

Lex专栏:Meta和微软通过季度理智检查

科技巨头今天吹捧真正的胜利,以证明明天的巨额投资是合理的。投资者对此是支持的,但程度有限。

FT社评:英国工党预算——雄心勃勃,前景不明

财政大臣蕾切尔•里夫斯现在必须兑现她的投资计划,否则税收还将进一步增加。

Lex专栏:大众汽车很难走出死胡同

尽管这家汽车制造商计划裁员和关闭工厂,但投资者的担忧是可以理解的。

安谋如何成为人工智能投资热潮中的意外赢家

这家由软银控股的英国芯片设计公司的股价在过去一年上涨了两倍。但它的野心远不止于此。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×